Thursday, March 24, 2016

Taking collaboration to a whole different level


Not too long ago it was difficult to believe that a small group of people working at home could make a product and sell it in a global scale, even harder to believe was that the same small group of people could raise the resources needed to reach this goal.

Until Kickstarter showed up in 2009 and the game changed.
Kickstarter helps people and companies start ventures and projects by crowdfunding them; projects that otherwise wouldn't have seen the light of day. Examples form this projects vary from Backpacks that raised over $300,000 to homemade 3D printers, to watches that raised over $20,000,000 to movie reboots.

Crowdfunding works by:


Consumer projects are no the only ones that have been taking advantage of the crowdfunding model.
There are websites such as GoFundMe, which allows people to raise money for a wide range of matters, ranging from life events (celebrations and graduations) to challenging circumstances (accidents and illnesses) and even global disaster relive efforts (such as Nepal aid campaigns).

And there are even sites now that promote scientific research, Experiment.com is a great example, individuals, schools and scientists can contribute money or time towards achieving scientific discoveries.

The site claims: "You can fund a dinosaur fossil excavation, a historical study of medieval monestaries, or an experiment on the International Space Station. If it helps unlock new knowledge, then we can fund it. We have the technology."

Every dollar is spent trying to push the boundaries of knowledge and give it back to the community.
This platform is still developing and it has already published twenty papers in scientific journals through funded experiments.

This makes me wonder what's next:
Could we collaborate and crowdfund a sustainable city?
Could we fund a mission to Mars?

We'll have to wait and see (or participate) to see were Crowdfunding takes us, I believe its going to be a very exiting decade for global collaboration.

[EVK]




Act now for our planet's sake


We [humans] are the colonists and rulers of the Earth, we live on borrowed resources provided by a planet that has been too generous to us for millennia, it is estimated that life began on earth three thousand two hundred million years ago1, however in just a few centuries we have been spending most of our easy accesible resources. This must stop if we want future generations to call this planet their home.

We spend resources a lot faster than they recover; We consume, without any kind of self-restraint, the planet's fertile soil, minerals, fossil fuels, ecosystems, and generally everything that the planet provides us (including ecosystem services).

A clear example is underground drinking water aquifers; we are consuming them in an unsustainably way. We consume square meters per year and the only aquifers are only recharged / recovered year a few millimeters per year. Which means that we are overexploiting the aquifers, and if pumped too fast they could collapse and never recharge again.

While neglecting the efficient exploitation of aquifers: We are urbanizing, paving and building on land that is needed to recharge them, thus rainwater can not penetrate the soil and recharge the underground reserves. This water, that could be beneficial in the future, ends up discharged into the ocean, which then is mixed with saltwater and is not longer suited for human consumption.
Access to clean water has already been the subject of conflict, creating water wars in the Middle East and if we continue in this path is very likely that it will be a cause of wars in more countries around the world.

On the other hand, the biodiversity that supports our lives and our economy are being consumed rapidly, the last time that biodiversity was lost in such a fast pace was in the mass extinction event of dinosaurs and took nearly 20 million years for biodiversity to return to previous levels.
Although one could say that biodiversity is a renewable resource, its renewal rate is very slow, and is much slower than our rate of consumption / destruction of it.

Our habit of consumption makes us need a lot of energy for our daily lives. The dependence on fossil fuels that we have is scary; As we consume existent fossil fuel reserves we need to exploit new ones that are less easy to reach and therefore every time we pollute more to extract this resources. And by polluting to extract we damage the ecosystems that could help trap emissions. Creating an unsustainable vicious cycle.

Energy consumption per person in developed countries is very high; the impact on the planet is too strong:
The average energy use per person in the United States of America is 12kW / p, while in less developed countries is close to 2kW / p. It is estimated that people in the United States of America could live a full life using only 3kW / p and the difference of 9kW / p is mostly wasted.

In the last 150 years due to population growth and increased consumption we have achieved two twentyfold our impact on the planet's systems that support our lives.
We have used more than 50% of the easy accessible aquifers1, we have destroyed more than half the tropical forest2, more than a quarter of the corals3, have deteriorated by more than 10% the fertile soil4. And not only that, but we have destroyed 40% of the planet's productivity4 (the resources the planet gives us for free). We've taken care of changing the chemical composition of the atmosphere, we have exploited and moved huge banks of materials, we have thrown oil in the oceans, all this in just 150 years.
We cannot keep damaging our planet.
_____________________
1,2,3,4(2002) Lecture of Andrés Marcelo Sada Chair "Planeta Finito", issued by Dr. Paul Ehrlich at the Tecnologico de Monterrey

Our lives are made possible by natural ecosystems on the planet that supports us. From microbes to animals, to trees, to oil deposits, and the interactions between them and the services they provide to us.

We have very great challenges to attack in the short to medium term, before the damage is so severe that humans will be on the eve of extinction.
The main challenge for the world is population control.
The population needs to be controlled, so that births should be lower than deaths. The population growth not only damages the environment through the consumption needs but also helps to spread viruses and diseases much faster.


Developed and developing countries, such as the United States and Mexico, need to change the mentality of people through education, awareness and culture to teach people to analyze and judge, to think for themselves to assess the accuracy of the information they are getting and make appropriate judgments and decisions.

Another important challenge will be to stop designing cities for car usage; we need to start planning based on people and therefore promoting less harmful transportation systems.
Also we need to start using clean ways of getting the energy that we need, the technologies are at our disposal. A clear example is Tesla Motors' PowerWall.


The damage is already happening globally, we can appreciate the increased flooding, forest fires, droughts, intense heat waves, pest outbreaks, death of corals, strength and destruction of typhoons and hurricanes and the geographical scope of diseases (influenza, dengue, chincuncuya, zika, etc.), all of the above are, possibly, manifestations of climate change.

We consume everything that is within our reach without, we multiply and look for more places to exploit. Repeating the destructive cycle over and over again.
However we are destroying the only planet (currently known) that gives us the resources we need to survive and to reach happiness.
The stable climate of the past that helped the development of humanity is changing rapidly. Very son it could be a thing of the past, so it is very likely that this change in the short term will impact our ability to feed ourselves, to develop and live life in its fullest.

We need to take action on the matter immediately; we can not give us the luxury of apathy. The time to act is now.



___________________
Sources:

International Energy Agency (IEA). "World Energy Outook 2015". Retrieved on March 22, 2016 from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/

Edmonds, J. (2004). Implications of a Technology Strategy to Address Climate Change For the Evolution of Global Trade and Investment. Policy and Governance Working Paper. Retrieved on March 22, 2016 from: http://coe21-policy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/ja/wp/WP25.pdf

Holdren, J. P. (2010), Director, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Energy-Technology Innovation and the Climate-Change Challenge. Retrieved on March 22, 2016 from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/holdren-arpa-e-03032010.pdf

Web site of the National Commission for the Efficient Use of Energy (CONUEE). Retrieved on March 22, 2016 from: http://www.conuee.gob.mx/wb/Conuee/programas

(2015) International Energy Agency, Energy Statistics of OECD Countries. Retrieved on March 22, 2016 from: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2014.pdf

(2011) IPCC 2011 Special Report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Summary for Policymakers Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Retrieved on March 24, 2016 from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srren/srren_report_es.pdf

Edmonds, J. (2014) Global Energy Technology Strategy Addressing Climate Change: Initial Findings from an International Public-Private Collaboration. Battele Memorial Institute, Wshington, D.C. Retrieved on March 24, 2016 from: http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/data/gtsp/docs/GTSP-indfind.pdf

Tenenbaum, D. (2002). "When Did Life on Earth Begin? Ask a Rock". Astrobiology Magazine. Retrieved on March 24, 2016 from: http://www.astrobio.net/news-exclusive/when-did-life-on-earth-begin-ask-a-rock/

Bishop, B. (2015) Energy Tesla's Elon Musk is battery system can power That homes, Businesses, and the world. USA: The Verge Retrieved on March 28, 2016 of http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/1/8525309/tesla-energy-elon-musk-battery-announcement

Tesla Power Wall Mexico. Retrieved on March 18, 2016 to:
https://www.teslamotors.com/es_MX/powerwall?redirect=no

Tesla Motors Power Wall. Retrieved on March 28, 2016 to:
https://www.teslamotors.com/powerwall

The Fight for Knowledge


After reading a very interesting Case Study on Wikipedia, I started to investigate a little more on its origins and how it has helped to shape the way users get their information. And not only that; but how it has also shifted the way people expect to use and access information nowadays.

On my last post, I wrote about how social networks and social media are used to shape modern elections, but collaborative website like Wikipedia, iFixit and Quora have (in my opinion) moved the world forward:

On Wikipedia you can get very reliable information1, and it has been exponentially growing to almost 5,000,000 articles2:



Many sites tried collaboration to spread knowledge, but failed miserably. Even one site created by Wikipedia's founders (before wikipedia) called Nupedia failed.

Also there's the story of Aaron Swartz's (If you don't know about him finish reading this blog and then fire up Netflix and watch the documentary on him called "The Internet's Own Boy" or click here").

Aaron came up with the notion of a Wikipedia before the founders even thought of it3 and even those first efforts didn't materialize. In a sense, Wikipedia is one of the few survivors of various sites that have tried to use collaboration to spread knowledge globally.

iFixit for instance4; has over 19,290 free product manuals, more than 75,300 solutions to fix problems of over 5,440 devices. This collaborative site, works under the Creative Commons license and aims to reduce electronic waste by teaching people how to repair their devices.

What's different between the site that fail and the sites that flourish?
In my opinion: Openness and instant feedback.

In sites like Wikipedia, iFixit and Quora users can add or change an article/guide/question and see it instantly published. And as soon as its online, users can modify it or add content to it. There's no waiting time nor a review process nor an approval Committee.

These sites were very successful in creating a very participative decentralized network of creators and critics that is open to all spectators from the groundswell.

Decentralizing knowledge was the goal of Aaron Swartz and by trying to fight an uphill battle it ultimately destroyed him.


We should all fight for open knowledge, since is knowledge what will empower people to make better decisions. And after all, we are here because of our decisions and the ones that our ancestors made before us.

So fight for knowledge and fight to make this world a better place for all mankind.

[EVK]


1Terdiman, D. (2005). Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica. Retrieved March 22, 2016 from: http://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/
2Graph Source: HenkvD - Own work. Number of articles on en.wikipedia.org and Gompertz extrapolation. retrieved March 22, 2016 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#/media/File:EnwikipediaGom.PNG
3Segall, L. (2014). Aaron Swartz's father: He'd be alive today if he was never arrested. Retrieved March 22, 2016 from: http://money.cnn.com/2014/06/27/technology/aaron-swartz-father/
4iFixit Leaderboard.  Retrieved March 22, 2016 from: https://www.ifixit.com/Users?order=date